>>7149728It's just that the main bet in such a society would be on a goodwill of the people, their will to move humanity further, and their understanding that they get the free stuff, but they have to work too and contribute to continue getting the free stuff.
I suppose it would have worked, had it been accepted earlier, and, while the ages were going by, the chance of it succeeding were rapidly diminishing.
Also, yes, with the present overpopulation of the planet it is already physically impossible to provide everything needed for all of the 7.5 billion people out there, even with the instant transfer to such a system and instant reshaping of the minds of the people.
So it's all up to wealth redistribution now.
