>>17255271Fair enough, but that's everyone's general explanation. I think it goes even deeper than that.
When Alex Jones did the bit about atrazine (?) turning frogs gay, everyone pretty much unanimously laughed. However, in recent years he's been proved right (or his sources were). As you've probably heard by now, the frogs that were exposed to high levels of the stuff from runoff water from nearby farms actually had severe anatomical and hormonal abnormalities.
Where am I going with this?
I think there are other things in our water, food, and air that are changing our biological chemistry. Men aren't as manly as they used to be, and women aren't as feminine as they used to be. Reproductive issues which used to be rare are now commonplace. Some people believe that this is a result of modern medicine getting better, and thus people are seeking help for problems that, in decades past, they would've simply hidden or tried to ignore. Having said that, I don't think that this sudden spike in myriad reproductive and anatomical anomalies is natural—it's far too widespread to be.
I guess it's a dead horse right now because nobody in the scientific community—at least not in the Western World—is bold enough to do any studies which might cast a negative light on transgenderism.
https://youtu.be/KGAAhzreGWw…sigh.
