>>13372711mind posting a picture of a microscope too so i can examine that?
ok i can address what you call arguments
>You did not address the flat horizon rising to eye level,it doesn't, pic related
>you did not address why NASA at 75,000 feet shows a huge curvethey use fish eye i understood you thought as much
>where as amateaur footage at 120,000 feet shows noneit literally does show curve
>>13372693 but it's in the wrong direction suggesting someone manipulated the video material. or is the earth hollow? do it yourself, time stamp is 04:05
https://youtu.be/P5WRlBN_lfw, take a screenshot then compress it, it's curved
>you did not address how Neil Degrasse Tyson said there is absolutely no curve at 125,000 feet.he did not say that and if he did he is wrong. did you know people can be wrong. even if you think an argument from authority would work on me, people can be wrong
