>>20972026>Jesus was descended from Hebrews and Israelitescorrect.
>the word "Jew" wasn't used until the 4th CenturyIt doesn't matter how you call the people here in pic related. "Judaean" or "Jew", they are not Israelites. They are part of a religious congregation that is called "Judaism" (talmudism), thus they call themselves "Jews". It is not an ancestry to the Biblical Judahites, much less all of the Israelites. They believe their multi-racial congregation is somehow the people of the Bible, a pure clean direct unbroken exclusive racial lineage all the way back 4000 years to Jacob and his sons. Which is obviously absurd. And they somehow trace their lineag through the mother, contrary to how Israelites/Christians do it through the father.
"Jews" are not Israelites, they can not be for their obvious racial diversity, and even after the Biblical identification marks of Israel (they fulfill zero).
The new covenant would be with the house of Israel (scattered Israelites, ancient Europeans) and the house of Judah (not Edomite Pharisee or Khazars or Arabs). "House" means the actual descendants, not those who became "Judaeans" religiously. That can only be found in the establishment of 2000 years of Christendom, which is European Christians. Genesis 28:14, Jeremiah 31:31, Hebrews 8:8, Hosea 1:10, Romans 9:4, Galatians 4:5-7, Matthew 2:6, Luke 1:68, Isaiah 44:6, Revelation 21:12.
If you want to believe that a racial lineage to the Biblical Israelites is somehow fulfilled through your membership in the religion of "Judaism", you can believe that of course. You can claim all you like, just as black people claim they are Israelites. But that doesn't mean I have to accept your ridiculous claim. I am not a Zionist, I don't believe in your talmudic myths. I believe the Bible, and the only people who have all the right to claim the identity of the Israelites are European Christians. No one else, and that's what I believe. I don't believe in your Zionist cult.
