>>3574549>he actually takes the Black Book of Communism seriously>the same book that considered the number of unborn babies as "casualties of communism">the exact same book that uses the number of soviet WW2 casualties while combating the Nazis as death under communism>the same book that considers the number of casualties caused by America when invading vietnam as victims of communismHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA
Illiterate piece of shit, even the writers of the book admitted they bullshitted their way to take as many numbers out of context to inflate it to 100 million.
Here's the article in Spanish, for some reason the English one is taken down:-
http://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1997/10/31/les-divisions-d-une-equipe-d-historiens-du-communisme_3811179_1819218.html>"Jean-Louis Margolin and Nicolas Werth reproach Stéphane Courtois considering ‘the criminal dimension as one of the proper ones of the communist system’s set’, he writes in his text. ‘This results in taking away the phenomenon’s historic character’, claims Jean-Louis Margolin. ‘Even if the communist breeding ground can lead to mass crimes, the line between theory and practice is not evident, contrary to what Stéphane Courtois says.’ Disputing the ‘approximations’, ‘contradictions’, and ‘clumsinesses that make sense’, the two authors reproach Stéphane Courtois’s ‘obsession to reach one hundred million deaths’."Meanwhile, your failed ideology is the true victim of communism. We could always expand that list and put your name on it.
