>>9401487Meaning, based on current assumptions, it's literally impossible to complete. I'll play around with the numbers and provide some examples to realize how ridiculous the official narrative is:
>with 20K slave force and 20 years (instead of 14 years that we used as the initial assumption), we get a -27.71 time deficit, in days.>with 30K slave force and 20 years (instead of 14 years that we used as the initial assumption), we get a -10.59 time deficit, in days.>with 40K slave force and 20 years (instead of 14 years that we used as the initial assumption), we get a -2.04 time deficit, in days.>with 50K slave force and 20 years (instead of 14 years that we used as the initial assumption), we get a 3.10 time SURPLUS, in days, which is BARELY enough to cover the 3 actions required that I have no calculated yet (because I have no idea how fast they cull hull using wooden tools 45 tonnes stone blocks onto sand floor or how fast they can haul them into their destinated pyramid floors)And this is within a 20 year period, not 14 or 10 as the more recent narrative goes.
And even if we ignore the math above, there is something even more ridiculous in the whole narrative:
>this whole work schedule is only for the pyramid of Giza>this assumes 11h work-day of extremely hard labor, 365 days/year>if the workers were not slaves but actual workers, then it makes sense to have more humane work-days (lack of work is preferable to death by exhaustion)>it assumes that big bronze saws were used, even though no such saws (of that size) have never been found (this were used by Egyptologists trying to prove their point)>with 50K slave force for 20 years, assuming a slave/guard ratio of 30 (no idea if this accurate or not), they'll need 3.33 thousands of soldiers to be on guard duty over these slaves.in a period where the general population was generally small. For example, regarding ancient Hellenistic world:
--- PART 3 ----
