>>21722375When we consider the modern man or normie. We can assume that they are aware of evolution and biology. At this point even the majority of Christians will recognise it. We can hijack this social consensus.
As living organisms we are subjected to the laws of nature and we have evolved under the basis of these laws.
Biology and evolution underpin our existence. They are the absolute bedrock and core of everything about us. Which is why I believe that an ethno-centric religion must focus on this core concept of the laws of nature.
There is also the idea of ethnic groups being massive multicellular organisms. Sure, one can cherry pick individuals showing the differences between us. But on average we can see that ethnic groups exist. That is something that the average normie won’t even argue against. This provides us an opening.
Just like the origin of life on this planet started with single cell organisms which have evolved into the myriad of complex multicellular life forms. Such as the human body which has 35 trillion cells and 200 cell types. Humans are the same. Social classes, normies, noticers and social parasites are all a sign that each ethnic group behaves as a rudimentary multicellular organism. (Rudimentary because of the poor social class distinctions).
Now how did Christianity, atheism, communism and freemasonry spread? From the (((priesthood))). Top down via a hijacked social hierarchy.
How should the opposing moral framework spread? Top down. So how do we get a moral framework to spread like that? It has to be accepted and spread by the European priesthood. As such it must be logical(it has to hijack the current social consensus), it must have clear benefits for these spreading it and those adopting it.