>>21148614>>The Talmud commands to burn the new testament>IncorrectIt's correct
There is a command to burn "the rest" on weekdays
It is impossible to escape the fact it is a command
It is not talking about waiting for a house to burn down
>you took one word Incorrect. The concept of removing holy words before the burning is not something that can be done intentionally unless the burning itself is intentional
It's not one word, it's an entire chain of interconnected logical reasoning and to get around it you literally had to say:
>they're trying to save shit from a fire so they're cutting out a few words and letting the rest burnThis is pure absolute insanity. You think during a house fire they take some scrolls, cut out the holy parts, and throw them back
You are completely out of your kike mind
>intent of that book had nothing to do with intentional book burningToo bad the spirit and intent of the book doesn't' matter because a single sentence does not have to follow a universal intent of a book you kike scum
The Talmud directly commands to burn the new testament. It is not a victim complex to point that out.
You lied and claimed I "admitted" I dont dislike you kikes <------YOUR NEWEST LIE
You lied and said I must have missed parts regarding incidental fire
You lied and claimed that every paragraph of that book is in the context of incidentals
You lied that I think the Talmud order to burn the New Testament is an order to kill me
You lied about the name not being jewish
You lied about the name not being jewish
You lied about a precedence of polish 1st jewish 2nd
You lied I "went" with "2nd one"
You lied and said I won't commit to it being a jewish suffix "all of the sudden"
You lied via implying it's not "polish AND jewish, not OR"
You lied via claiming I lied when I said "jewish and polish" bc order does not matter
You lied that the context of when the books MUST burn is merely a "house fire"
You lied that it is not a book burning protocol
