>>14171371Take into consideration that society and civilization was something that evolutionary biology didn't "account" for, in nature females do not teach males stuff beyond basic things - this can be seen in some of our older religious texts too: whamen shalln't teach men shit or something like that; weak cannot teach the strong - you don't take advice from losers, because whatever they do is what makes them lose.
Now if you can apply what I just said in the most primitive manner you can think of, then factor in that all the modern societal norms are non-existent, then you see how biology and instincts work. The instincts are still there even though we have become more "civilized". If men were individually smart about women, our species would've died long time ago - the blindspot men have towards women, our compassion and empathy is necessary for the survival of our species. Thus it is in the best interest of the species to perpetuate the ignorance.
>mothers should have the best interests of her children at heart but not all do.It's called natural selection. If you have siblings you'd notice that even when parents are the same (hopefully), each one of you are slightly different. Every generation has some slight alterations, these alterations affect how it interacts with the reality, some random 0 turned into a 1 can make a woman kill her child when exposed to certain stimulus, like hearing a Nickelback song. Thus her lineage will be eliminated, her modus operandi doesn't work, it's not sustainable. This is "automatic"
Much like with the whole viral mutation thing people are fuzzing about, why each variant is less deadly: the more deadly variants simply don't get the chance to pass on, because they kill the host too quickly. (assuming that the pandemic shit is even real) The virus doesn't THINK to make this change, it just happens and what is optimal enough, what is fit, will remain.
