>>15968218>You predicated your opinion based exactly off these topics. And since you can't effectively answer these questions your opinions on the universe are irrelevant. I don't know how many times I have to explain this.I don't know how many times I have to explain that which deity it is irrelevant.
>It's not an assumption, it's an observation based off how you argueTrying to explain my position? I wasn't calling you arrogant for disregarding my opinion, I was calling you arrogant for assuming we have a great understanding of everything.
>You keep attempting to move the goal postI haven't moved it at all. Here is my first post
>picrelI do specify God here. And I am referring to the Christian God, as it was the context of the thread. But the argument is just justifying a God's necessity.
Now at one point in the last thread you asked me what god or more specifically 'Which god? Your very special and favorite one? How do you know its one?" I view this as asking me of my personal opinion, which I quickly brushed off and just responded "And yes it's my favorite God because I have faith." That has nothing to do with my argument, just my opinion unrelated to the argument.
>Only if you disavow the story of Abraham.This argument isn't about the Christian God, or any specific God. It's about the necessity of a God's intervention for the Big Bang.