>>252964972I'm not quite sure I know what you mean, my friend and swede poster. Please do not get me wrong, this is an interesting thread filled with interesting assumptions about the capability and responsibilities of women , but I am entirely unable to come to the conclusion that I could ever be owned by a woman, you see. I am a man. I have a penis. It's quite a nice penis, or, at least that is what my wife tells me.
Some days I am unsure as to whether she is lying to curry favor, but I do not spend much time dwelling on such insecurities. being the rightful owner of my wife wife as i am a man is nice.
It is possible of course, swede poster, that the technology might one day exist that will allow a person or persons to "merge" with a computer in such a manner that they do, for all intents and purposes gain the intellectual capacity of a man and in turn "own the man instead of the man owning them", but that in itself carries with it a myriad of issues. Can a being be, in a sense, two beings? If one owns a man, can one simultaneously be that man and remain a woman? If so, would that mean the woman in turn would then have to assume all the male responsibilities while the man would relinquish them and look after the home?
Sadly however, I have so very few answers for these questions, swede poster. Perhaps some time when you're around though, I would enjoy discussing what I do know about the natural male birthright of owning women with you.
