Good morning, Jew, how's your day?
>>1788102>I'm not reading any of it.Yet you read the other wall the text.
>>1788162>If you want to do some actual philosophy as opposed to just abusing the term, you can try to analyze what features of natural language make this possible and come up with a "fix" that doesn't completely neuter them.>you can try to analyze what features of natural language make this possible>features of natural languageYou are a fucking idiot aren't you.
Wasn't this what I was just doing? semantics?
Okay, I'll put it short and sweet because it seems you were unable to retain anything of value from my previous post.
These paradoxes were coined "the liar's paradox" for some reason. It's a play on words. The common pitfall for this one is how it lures you to try and solve something that is not there, instead of reading between the lines, and recognizing that there's not a question, and hence-wards, not an answer. This requires you to think out of the box, and analyze what the authors intent was, surely takes more than straightforward math.
I don't know how can you disagree with my approach when we got to the same conclusion. There's not an answer.
Now I'm utterly convinced that you really have no idea what you are talking about and you probably got this image from reddit and posted it here.
