>>21851146i said he wasnt real from the very start anon. in the last thread, and im pretty sure in this thread also. i made that clear multiple times. that jesus raping a kid was more about the writer and his target audience, that was the entire point of bringing it up.
this whole part about part is not in the text, but theres a reason why paul's jesus is a concept or spirit, rather than a literal man. paul, who infiltrated and d&c'd the gnostics, had a schizophrenic hallucination which he deceptively called "jesus". and if you lay out the writings chronologically, its quite easy to conclude that it was paul's spiritual messiah who he deceptively called jesus, would evolve into the stories of a physical man and became the jesus character of the gospels.
