>>21398012It depends on your definition of symbolic. If you think symbols have no power than I see why someone might try to argue it's not symbolic.
I happen to believe symbols are extremely powerful. In fact, I suspect symbols are capable of shaping the course of history.
Anyway, many theocratic arguments are more or less people believing in the same things just nitpicking over semantics.
>YOU SAID THE COOKIE WAS MAGIC.>NO.>NUH-UH, YOU SAID!