>>22330116There most probably is a creator (of the simulation) but who the fuck ever heard of a creation worshipping its creator? Laughable. The creator creates for a reason and it's not to be worshipped, it's to solve some problem, unless we are an equivalent of art. Still, art isn't made to worship its creator.
>>22330120>This theory rests upon a mathematical supposition and not physical realityYou seem unequipped to actually understand and assess this theory
