>>10494006Three paragraphs and not a single logical argument for protectionism, just emotional appeals and calling me a jew like the retard you are.
>the duty of the government is to protect the economic viability of its peopleCompletely fucking wrong, I wish it was like that because at least governments would have an idea of a goal but governments as they are don't have a clear purpose other than "protecting" its populace, whatever that means. Read a bit about formalism and neocameralism.
>>10494007Never claimed it was "protected" because it doesn't need to be you little bitch.
