>>9217772You are a smart person. It is likely the paid satanists and pornography company owners who are behind the brainlet idea that pornography consumption is "ok" and being antipornography makes you a shill. It is also amazing how they lack substance or scientific studies to support their satanic claims.
Pornographic picture processing interferes with working memory performance. Results revealed worse WM performance in the pornographic picture condition of the 4-back task compared with the three remaining picture conditions. Furthermore, hierarchical regression analysis indicated an explanation of variance of the sensitivity in the pornographic picture condition by the subjective rating of the pornographic pictures as well as by a moderation effect of masturbation urges. Results contribute to the view that indicators of sexual arousal due to pornographic picture processing interfere with WM performance. Findings are discussed with respect to Internet sex addiction because WM interference by addiction-related cues is well known from substance dependencies.
Source: Laier, C., Schulte, F. P., & Brand, M. (2013). Pornographic picture processing interferes with working memory performance. Journal of sex research, 50(7), 642-652.
