>>13057192>would rather wagecuck for 50 years or do sporadic work and be better off materially"better off materially". Do you realize that your own vices are causing you to put faith in Marxism? It is your greed, your desire for self-satiation and material gains that makes you believe Marxism is ideal. It is your sloth and laziness, your disdain for work that makes you believe Marxism is ideal.
What are your major complaints about capitalism? The masters are "greedy, and they get paid too much despite doing very little work". This is the exact same thing that you want for yourself. You're arguing "I am entitled to be the fat capitalist pig at the top who does little work for copious returns, and those people who aren't me who have what I want are in the wrong."
There is no contentment provided by attaining these material gains. See picture.
>>13043585 There is pleasure in work. The only reason you are discontented is because you desire things, not because you are the victim of anybody. You really think Communism would magically give you "everything you desire"? That somehow "work becomes unnecessary and that you sit and indulge in decadence and luxury because the scary capitalists are dead"? That's ridiculous.
>How are they not qualitative too? They have certain qualities like fonI'm arguing that anything which can be readily expressed by a computer is quantitative because it can be produced and represented solely by data, which is ultimately a number system such as hexadecimal.
If something can be produced and replicated in the identical form entirely from quantities, such as the way a font is produce from a code, independent of subjective experience, then it remains quantitative, or more accurately objective and empirical.
