>>10972835>More powerful than the NK nuke tests but somehow 'too weak' to 'be a nuke' according to the shills?It's the most powerful surface explosion since Tianjin (which was also a nuke). People aren't investigating whether a new type of warhead has been created which leaves little fallout, except HEU.
>>10972841>if it was a nuke there would be a large radioactive signature. none has been reported.Actually Tel Aviv is now showing 43uSv/hr.
