>>10162392i like my conspiracies to be plausible instead of tin-foil hat tier. intentional chinese bioterrorism is a conspiracy i can feasibly see, because the motivations and methodology and events make sense in that context. the government tanking the economy and spending vast swathes of money and encountering all sorts of problems for themselves just to play tyrant for a little bit is nonsensical, especially when you have to realize trump is still the leader of the executive, so you're implying all sorts of things that don't work together with what we know. it's on line with the 5G causes coronavirus or "this is all a big conspiracy for bill gates to give us the mark of the beast" posting
there's no proving speculation, but in the absence of evidence occam's razor makes the slip of the tongue a far more likely scenario than "vast intergovernment conspiracy" i guarantee you if there was any possibility of something that secret being discussed, there would be no possibility of an open mic accidentally picking it up or it occurring in a public newsroom filled with cameras and microphones in the first place
