>>10279006I don't understand how they do it, nor how their range is that great
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2rd6HuGrNA another good recent one. I tried out the wjsn version of this first but the lineup there was just them and WAY too much gaypop
>>10279018if only we kept the older naming convention around instead of trying to be all objective on it science is dumb
very omo stuff