Quoted By:
>We Christians don’t hate sex
>We just hate fornication and degeneracy
It’s hilarious that Christians in the West are trying to change their tune now that their religion is dying off and nobody is listening to their bullshit.
The church is trying so hard to be
>Sex positive for married couples
When all of church history has been the opposite.
>Banning anal sex
>Banning oral sex
>Putting out books depicting which sex positions are sex approved
>Throwing acid on women’s vaginas (Adventists)
>Claiming masturbation seeps the life out of a man
>Claiming nutting in your wife’s mouth is a sin
>Circumcising men to lower their sexual experience
>Claiming sex should be quick, infrequent, and without joy (Victorians)
>Claiming that celibacy is a higher spiritual existence
>Claiming that remaining unmarried is better than ever being married (literally fucking Paul)
The church has always been ran by bitter incels who hated sex.
The reason why women won’t listen to you about “degeneracy” is because the church overplayed its hand. It’s obvious all their sexual laws are transparent attempts to control their congregation through sexual frustration. The goal is to keep the churchgoer on the lowest rung of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs without risking death, making sex the easiest target.
So why do women not care when you argue in favor of abstinence and anti-homosexuality? Because everything the church has said previously about sex has been total horseshit. Anyone with an IQ above 100 does not feel “sexual shame” on account of being a mammal. Your Catholic guilt is mind control for retards. If you feel shame after your wife blows you, you have the brain of a beaten puppy.
Your only real argument is abstinence, but most women aren’t fucking dozens of dudes from the bar. They get a boyfriend and start fucking him regularly. The only difference is they’re not married, but marriage is a dead concept in the West anyways, so what’s the real difference?