>>11616488yes i saw that. don't know what that outfit was about and i don't think i'll even try to find out cause no explanation would be better.
>>11616537yeah lol i just posted it because of the funny title. but in this case it's clearly clickbait no? the article explains what is meant perfectly cogently. i'm more shocked at all the redditors not getting it. are they really that stupid or do they desperately want to get their zingers out there?