>>17022257>>17022258Not a problem, we have more resources.
https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2020/02/24/sorry-the-shroud-of-turin-is-definitely-a-hoax/Evidence #1: The Shroud of Turin has no reliable provenance prior to the fourteenth century.
Evidence #2: We have the documented confession of the forger who created the Shroud of Turin.
Evidence #3: The Shroud of Turin doesn’t match the kinds of shrouds that were actually used in Judaea during Jesus’s time or the description of Jesus’s shroud given in the Gospel of John.
Evidence #4: The Turin Shroud was radiocarbon dated and the material definitively dates to sometime between c. 1260 and c. 1390.
Evidence #5: The image on the Turin Shroud has unrealistic anatomical features that are consistent with Gothic artwork, but not with real human anatomy.
Evidence #6: The blood stains on the Turin Shroud are not consistent with how blood naturally flows and the stains instead appear to have been painted on.
Evidence #7: The fabric of the Shroud of Turin uses a herringbone twill weave, which is a kind of complex weave that was used in the Late Middle Ages for high-quality textiles, but is not known to have been used for burial shrouds in the first century AD.
You just cannot avoid the evidence of age of the thing.
https://archive.org/download/jos-encyclopedia/ALL-SECTIONS_JoS_Encyclopedia_.pdf