>>9059001Depending on what method is used to check the winver, it could come back with a "Windows 98" instead of a "Memphis Build 4.10".
The Microsoft coders saw that third-party developers were lazy, and that they had inadvertently created a future-bug by looking for "Windows 9*" (please note the asterisk) instead of looking for a proper build number.
It's actually a clever solution on the part of the Microsoft coders, for a problem that they did not create. I don't know whether to be impressed that they convinced the marketing-morons to go along with it. They've never seemed to care about sensible product versions anyway.
