>>10969963>In all honesty, I think 2+2=4 is the superior choice as well.>It is a lot more clear and simple.Agreed, although 10/2=5 is a close contender.
However, 2+2=4 seems to be the best, because making such an obvious statement 'rayciss' or whatever serves to prove with the eloquence of 1000 words how out-of-touch these people are.
Not to mention that it may really do quite a bit to get the normies' blood boiling.
Plus it is an excellent insider reference to '1984' to boot.
----------------------
For the lurkers who have not yet read babby's first redpill, a bok called '1984' by George Orwell:
[/spoiler:lit] The protagonist of the book is basically kidnapped by the State and forced to not only say but actually BELIEVE that 2+2=5.
This is partly why this potential op is such an opportunity.
>>10969967>My favorite is that they use our language.There was an American Rennaissance lecture available on YT by some guy analyzig African languages.
The basic conclusions were:
--They cannot count; they have an idea of few vs. many, but that's it.
--There is no future tense in most African languages/dialects, thus there is obviously no future planning, nor promises, contracts, etc.
Big surprise.
