>>10795498nah, the one who's getting mad at the assertions.
basically one person (the based one) is saying that statistically female fans spend more money and are more loyal with the latter being supported by male groups having basically 0 fallout for dating ""scandals"" when female groups frequently take numbers hits after them even though it's rarely anything incredibly dire.
another person (not based at all and very seething) just keeps saying "well if female fans didn't care about male groups dating then there would be no dating ban." every time the the first person tries to explain why that's not true and he isn't saying they don't literally not care in the first place they just repeat their claim.
i don't think the one poster is trying to imply that women are "better" because of this, just that they're a more valuable demographic to target
word. ever see aunt jemima? that's the one that kicked it all off
