>>10010533I mean there are shitholes that collect billions to use for social justice weekly in an essentially passive way.
The world best charities peer-to-peer enabled by social media boom, hardly gathered 100 million and never repeated to that same amount.
I'm not going to rely on neo-liberals, laisez-faire enthusiasts for anything, because I know it will never come from them.
I'm not advocating a commie government tho. they were all evil in 20th century and also failures.
I'm advocating for us promoting social-democracy, democratic-socialism, Christian democrats and letting people democratically vote them in a parliamentary republic with constitution that defends human rights - fun fact, the universal human rights bill was first conceptualized by a bunch of Christians.
I have sympathies with anarcho-communism ideals and I would like to see grass-root movements, but the world needs to have a shift in mentality for that.
I don't see why you're pushing those lines which libertarians usually do that hurt all social movements from the left.
YOu can see that I can state my position and present my info with denouncing communism from 20th century as well.
I have also pointed out in the way you respond the tactic, especially in that conceptual map if you checked it out.
I don't think the way you do it is fair.
This is where I heard about that study:
https://www.ted.com/talks/jonathan_haidt_the_moral_roots_of_liberals_and_conservatives?language=enI went on and checked their numbers and findings on the study website, you can do that too.
I've also listened to some libertarian podcasts - and some points there proven to me that they lacked moral integrity and sometimes were incoherent.
But at the same time I noticed that libertarians are open for long discussions and care about going in-depth as well.
But hey, libertarians are the type of people that will be found in every single room and environment - mainly because they are pragmatic, so no hate...
