>>20269061Quality of the woman aside, if your only goal is just to "get laid", I really don't think it's that difficult at all if you just clean up a little, have good hygiene, and aren't hopelessly autistic. The real struggle is finding a good, loyal, ride or die girl that's actually aligned with your mission and wants to build something and share in your vision. Even more so if you want a virgin unfortunately. But that's why this whole "muh incel, muh sexless men" thing you hear about is so funny to me. I don't think there are very many men that absolutely cannot acquire a crumb of pussy (again, quality of the woman aside) despite their best efforts. I think it's just that a century of judeo-feminist propaganda and policy has created a situation where men don't think the juice is worth the squeeze.
>>20269133I guess it's just that for women, getting sex is as easy as opening your legs, while comparatively there are very few men that can just bang as they please. That being said, just because a man CAN, doesn't mean he should. Men can "hit the wall" too when they engage in too much casual sex (situationships, one night stands, serial monogamy, and playing house for a couple years all included), it's just more of an emotional thing and it takes far longer. Not to mention, such a man is in the best case just inflating undeserving women's egos, and worst case deflowering virgins and dumping them, both perpetuating the cycle of whoredom. They aren't entirely to blame though of course, because ultimately it's the woman who decides who she spreads her legs for, just like it's the man who decides whose finger he puts a ring on.
Personally, I do think we should ideally all be waiting until marriage to have sex. Even outside of a religious context, it makes sense and there's a reason why this was the standard for a long time. A woman having just ONE premarital sex partner makes her divorce rate go from 18% to over 40%. When no fault divorce exists, that's unacceptable.
