>>10073780>All processes need a conscious agent.Consciousness implies awareness and intentionality. Grey areas arise in both how you define "awareness", and to which party you would attribute the "intentionality" of a given process... intrinsic or extrinsic motivations are quite distinct. To imply all processes demand full knowledge borne within the entity on which the processes act upon is absurd.
The cascade effect doesn't mean that any given task is fully intentional in *that specific iteration*, but for it to have occurred demands the intentionality of one agent rendering the characteristics of that specific given process at a prior point in time.
>Radioactive decay is a process. Correct
>Therefore radioactive decay needs a conscious agent.The only agent here is one of entropy. The metaphysical laws (science) are embodied in perfect constancy. Gravity is both a process and also the basis for most all other physical constants, thus characterizing the difficulty in isolating gravity.
>Birds nest and jet engines prove process needs a conscious agent. These are two examples of processes initiated by a conscious agent and effected upon agents of indeterminate consciousness (intrinsic deliberation). Participants are allowed to function in near-identical reiterations of the original plan without much further preponderance of the processes of which they participate. Imagine having a panic attack because your Delta flight has an engine you haven't studied about, and for that reason you claim your flight would be incapable of taking off due to your own lack of mastery of the process. This does not deter the plane's function, in real life. Both the baby birds in the nest and passengers of an airplane are subject to these consciously implemented processes without being held accountable for the full scope of deliberation that only must be taken by the prime designer - in a Boeing, that is the Chief Engineer.
>Therefore all processes need a conscious agent. Yes.
