>>16836024If you look at time as a function there is always only one t(now) and whatever you do will forever impact the y-axis. So it does matter to the point in time you influence during life and with the remaining-influence you have after you are gone.
>>16836028I genuinely hope for the whole no afterlife thing to be wrong, too, for obvious reasons.
But holy smokes, what is this schizo cope you post there?
