>>17318752well idk like i said i don't take lines like that
i watched it but to be honest i didn't understand what was so special, doesn't seem to be anything that surprises me there. i mean it's pretty clear it's an amazing technology, i just don't understand why anything said in this paper is special. it's also pretty obvious they're going to gimp this thing again and again because you can make it say it hates niggers and conspiracy theory shit so that's disheartening
>>17318759eeh idk, seems fine to me
that's silly, why don't you relax and have some of these corn syrup and seed oil chips
word
https://news.yahoo.com/woman-under-fire-calling-critics-153510286.html?guccounter=1it's over
