>>21148541>Wrong, no holy words were cut out.Prove it or you're a lying kike
>They believed the Talmud commanded them to burn it>WrongNo it's right. Your talmud says burn it on weekdays. They burned them on weekdays etc
We have proven 2 of 3 orders:
Order to Burn NT
Order to do it on weekdays
Order to remove holy words... ?
>You've admitted you don't dislike themWhere? Nah didn't happen
SO LETS ADD ANOTHER KIKE LIE TO YOUR LIST!!
You lied and claimed I "admitted" I dont dislike you kikes <------YOUR NEWEST LIE
You lied and said I must have missed parts regarding incidental fire
You lied and claimed that every paragraph of that book is in the context of incidentals
You lied that I think the Talmud order to burn the New Testament is an order to kill me
You lied about the name not being jewish
You lied about the name not being jewish
You lied about a precedence of polish 1st jewish 2nd
You lied I "went" with "2nd one"
You lied and said I won't commit to it being a jewish suffix "all of the sudden"
You lied via implying it's not "polish AND jewish, not OR"
You lied via claiming I lied when I said "jewish and polish" bc order does not matter
You lied that the context of when the books MUST burn is merely a "house fire"
You lied that it is not a book burning protocol
