Quoted By:
>The false Nuremberg confessions were obtained via genital torture.
Lt. william perl was a jew from Austria who had emigrated to America in 1940. He was the chief interrogator of Germans accused of the Malmedy massacre. This was because he could speak fluent German; and indeed many of the interrogators at Nuremberg were German or Austrian jews who had emigrated to America before WWII and were known as the ‘ritchie boys’. There were roughly 9000 of these jews in America and they specialized in the “interrogation” of German prisoners.
Perl supervised the torture of the German defendants. He was an ardent and active zionist and was assisted by other jews in his endeavors to extract confessions by the infliction of maximum pain. jews specalizing in torture techniques at Nuremberg included josef kirschbaum, harry thon and morris ellowitz.
This is what Wikipedia used to say about the interrogation of Germans at Malmedy:
>The accusations [against the German defendants] were mainly based on the sworn and written statements provided by the defendants in Schwäbish Hall. To counter the evidence given in the men’s sworn statements and by prosecution witnesses, the lead defense attorney, Lieutenant Colonel Willis M. Everett tried to show that the statements had been obtained by inappropriate methods.
Note that exquisite euphemism: “inappropriate methods”. That’s how respectable, politically correct Americans refer to confessions obtained under torture. The methods are not described as horrendously cruel. They are not described as morally indefensible. They are described as “inappropriate”.
