>>13071438Ok back to arguing with the Canadian boy.
>>What sort of logic is that? Are you ok with the sadness? >No where did you come to the conclusion that I was?You said you didn't care about the peasant's happiness.
>A classless system with slaves is an oxymoron.That's just a false statement. There is only 1 "class" of people, slaves, thus this is a classless society. The only way to have "Less than one class" of people is to have a set with 0 people in it. Otherwise there is at least one class. Classless means "everyone has the same class". It doesn't mean there are 0 classes, because then there are 0 people.
>strip 100% of people of 100% of power.>Hierarchies will exist as long as society existsThen communism resolves nothing? What? Your argument is to "destroy the social hierarchy", then you just say "social hierarchy is unavoidable unless everyone is dead". This comically does align with your 0 class system, because that also has 0 people in it
The point is an extensive system of checks and balances, one of those "everybody only has a part of they key to the door, but they have to put it in at the same time for the door to open", typical sort of "you need friendship to pass this test" moments in movies.
>>GDP per capitaThat's extremely inaccurate then. What? You wanted income stratification of America?
>Bottom Quintile: $15,286>below poverty line>Middle Class Nigerien>553.90The bottom 20% of America makes 27.59x as much as the middle class Nigerien. This is 2759% as much money. This money buys a middle class lifestyle in Niger, but only buys poverty in America. This is the cost of a decadent society. There is far less decadence in Niger.
>2021 poverty rate of 13.7 percentSo that would mean about 6% of them are retired people with holdings and property but little income, while 13.7% of this bottom 20% actually live in poverty
