>>16806147Nah, you were merely pretending.
Charting out people?
>>16806168That's good probably. But I assume it would be better than maple at least.
>>16806193Transhumanist?
I think this would be the classic case of just spending everything on this one thing and being overallt poor outside of it, creating a vicious cycle of spending money to escape mentally instead of saving up to build a better life.
