>>15315868>Then what, specifically, does it 'say'?That's up for interpretation, as I said. You're free to interpret it your way, and I'll do likewise. But assuming that you know 100% certain what he meant is literally what the worst Qtards do...you know, the people you were just complaining about? I advocate nothing more than that all people curious about Q read the posts themselves and make up their own minds, which is something Q specifically encouraged.
If you're asking me to interpret things like pic related, I mean...really, are you struggling with these basic concepts? If you're too dumb to take insight from what is said and relate it to other statements Q made, then...I dunno, dude. I have no interest in holding boomer's hands and guiding them through shit posted on Malaysian basket weaving imageboards.
>This is the problem - there is simply nothing there.What is there is breadcrumbs, that succeeded in getting millions of formerly dormant boomers who rejected conspiracy theories doing their own research and suddenly realizing that their government was far more evil than they were formerly capable of understanding. Only people who have been on /pol/ long enough to understand the sheer frustration and disgust at boomer optimism can truly appreciate what a massive paradigm shift was achieved here. Like it or not, tons of people who normally wouldn't take the time and effort to sort through redpills and infographics on a site like this suddenly are willing to put in the work to understand these things. That's an objective good in terms of tilting culture back in our direction.
I mean...did you forget that we're literally at a point where the concept of abortion being outlawed is happening? Shit is changing at a rapid rate. The overton window has become a series of holes punched in the wall, drifting right. We are privileged to witness this kind of societal upheaval.