>>17382670>Bro the method of isnad is exactly the same for the Quran and for hadithAgain, the Qur'an was revealed and memorized by the entire community of Muslims while hadiths were unknown to the vast majority of believers and only popped up along through time with few chains, most of which are entirely fabricated. Keep coping though.
>Your confusion might be coming from the fact that ''most'' hadith (numerically speaking) are not true, in the sense that they are weak or fabricated, which is the whole point of having a verification system to pick out the ones that have full narration chains that we can 100% trust. Picrel destroys the sunni.
>If you reject the concept of isnad and chains of narrations, you must reject the Quran as well. If you accept this concept but reject hadith because of the lack of quality of the chains, then we'd agree that the quality must be thouroughly checked, which gives you sahih hadith. Can't have it both ways.Nope because the authenticity of the Quran doesn't rely on chains nor are hadiths written in a inimitable style like the Quran.
>>17382673I accept your defeat.
