>>1520624I usually ask people to show their work. If they can't even show the base equations then they don't know what they're talking about.
Besides we're not even taking into account changes in gravitational force due to excess mass.
>https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/19813/calculating-gravity-when-taking-into-account-the-change-of-gravitational-force>It won't let me copy paste the equations :(>>1520632It wouldn't have the same mass for sure. It could have more considering it's using denser materials made of mostly carbon instead of helium. It would all be something you would have to spend time calculating starting with its mass and abundance.
>http://www.sisweb.com/referenc/tools/exactmass.htmI'm too lazy to white board it up right now but if you can calculate it out more power to you.
Considering the lack of abundance of super dense materials the newly formed sun would still be in a constant plasma state but instead it would have to hyper efficiently convert the matter into energy without entropy. Carbon isn't the best element for that even in some of its most dense states like coal and diamonds. All in all it would have to expand due to the reliance on carbon instead of He-3 which would be catastrophic.
Long post short I'd say it would either have more mass due to more materials being converted if it can still convert He-3 less if it loses the availability to convert He-3.
