>>6161028>I'm going to gloss over facts because I've ran out of argumentsanyway
>/bant/ doesn't want frogpostersfrogposters don't want cirno.
>pathetic whiners like >>6160863 → and >>6160846 who do nothing but mooch and attention whore because they lack the social skills to function properly or recognizesee this is where you're wrong, those guys may seem like normal frogposters but are not one of us, I don't even think they're aware about the whole cirnofag war, I like to call them the r9k ones.
>if /bant/ were to accept frogs there would be nothing setting us apart from them, which would lead us to be deleted.Wrong, frogs create ALOT of OC every week.
>This is why we hate frogposting,>we>not because the cirnofags want to freeze you or some autistic shit, but because you faglords are already /r9k/'s gimmick. C*Rnofags are 10x worse than any gimmick r9k has ever had desu, they brought this on themselves
>If we continue on the path you're trying to tug us into, our board will DIE.Not really, as I said frogs bring alot of OC.
>You act like a large part of the board hates Cirnoposting People get tired of the same shit with little to no OC, hell, I was a fucking c*Rnofag, and I noticed how retarded it was so I started posting frogs.
>You act like a large part of the board hates Cirnoposting Am I not right?
>The reality is that the majority of /bant/ simply doesn't careWhile some people may shitpost and act like it's typical random board shit, it really is not, c*Rnofags spam their queen every single fucking day for no reason other than >muh FORCED kultur and expect people to like it.
>You're fighting to have /bant/ killed.A board can't be "killed", /vip/ is the dead-est and it still has occasional posters.
