>>19958836>and also you are just outright lying when you say the only claim is from 1952 time magazine, because i linked the CURRENT cdc saying they could blind people.I mean from back then
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1312837/pdf/taos00051-0096.pdfIf it's all a hoax and conspiracy, surely they would have claimed to have found lots of blindness and retinal injury in this report?
If you are correct, and nukes are fake and gay, then how come the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission allowed this report to be published? The report found no blindness - wouldn't the commission fake it and lie and write about all the blinded people to try and keep the narrative?
