>>14869939it doesnt exactly work that way. in general yes there are universal attractive characteristics that represent univerally quality gene. height. symmetry. skin quality. teeth, hair, muscle.
that being said, when people breed with chad and stacey there is regression to the mean over time as these superior genes lucky enough to be expressed in Dad dont get passed on to his kid
further, there is sexy son hypothesis. like any phenotypical trait, facial feature etc are controlled by hundred of genes which can be further modified by the gender but are still expressed to a large degree. this means masculine looking fathers with big jaws and chad brows create masculine looking sons AND daughters. and vice versa
women simply overvalue Chads so much more because biologically speaking even if she has an ugly masculine daughter with him, daughters still get fucked and still pass on their genes most of the time. whereas ugly and average guys often die virgins. but a true giga chad could sow his seed hundreds of times
this is also why there's generally more masculine and more feminine races and ethnic groups too like our spanish friends here
>>14869851 who grow chads like weeds but also make more masculine looking women
