>>3673639>electric cars are only useful if you have your own house/garage and you can recharge it at nightNot with proper infrastructure. Speaking from my own experience, which admittedly is colored by the fact that norway has the most electric cars per capita in the world and an equally expansive infrastructure, electric cars are as useful as any other car.
What you said is essentially "the motor is only useful if you have fuel" to which the answer is "Yes obviously".
>we don't have an infinite source of lithium for batteries but hydrogen is the most common particle in the universeYeah because battery techonoly has no chance of developing and using other materials even though different battery types already exist.
Fuel cells are just a type of battery anyway.
>hydrogen is the most common particle in the universeBut not the rest of the materials which comprise the fuel cell. For instance the poisonous catalysts.
>hydrogen extraction uses less energy than powering an electric carHow is that relevant? It still uses fossil fuels, which was the point.
I don't really care which one is deemed "the future" because that's jsut a popsci meme but you seem to have a chip on your shoulder about electric cars for some reason even though every step of the way, electricity is required for the production of hydrogen fuel cells.
I don't understand why.
