>>19475310>>19475311Your definition of agnostic = one wishy-washy on the subject of God's existence, "maybe there's a God", is a gross mischaracterization pushed by theist and atheist zealots alike.
An agnostic is one who reserves their judgment before deciding to believe or not until the questions they have have been answered to their satisfaction.
There is no "maybe there's a God", there is "there are definitions of God, and therefore Gods themselves, I believe exist because the burden of proof has been adequately met".
Agnosticism is NOT some middle-ground between theism and atheism as popular nomenclature would have it.
