>>10863824>>10863745>but you seem to like those kinds of values.datz rite
>men are men women are women> men should be warriors and fathers, women homemakers, caretakers and mothers>degenerates should be killed, sinners should be shamed, faithful should be treated well>honoring of one's ancestors and heros, also their god/s. >people should treat nature and animals well. we all are a part of nature> I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with those either, even if they don't mesh well with our current ones.well that's my problem is current mainstream views are always current, and there's always a overtin window.
>By the way, is what you said about most religions having some kind of head garb true? i said that most cultures/ organize religions had some form of head covering for both genders, of course not all of them.
> I know that was true of earlier dress a quite a while ago, but I didn't know it had the same religious significance as it does in their culture.all 3 abrahamic religions had some sort of head covering. And that in ancient athens had their women covered.
pic is anglo-saxon dress
