>>9009207>>my god's bigger and badder and purer than all others, making him the right oneIs this the only thing you've come up with after reading all the text I posted? I've already told you that pagan gods are different from the Abrahamic God conceptually, you can't just put them to the same level and dumb their differences down to a battleshonen-tier power levels comparison. You can say that Zeus doesn't exist because modern science is capable of explaining the phenomena of lighting and thunder without applying for some supernatural powers, but disregarding the idea of transcendent God because, for example, it is said in the Old Testament that world is 6000 years old and it actually isn't is wrong, because, once again, that disproves only that exact statement, not the concept itself. And pro tip: this concept is irrefutable. It's up to you to believe it or not, but if you want to somehow disprove it with epic facts and logic, you're doomed to fail. If I fail to get my thoughts across you this time too, then Thomas Aquinas, Spinoza, Kant, Kierkegaard and many other interesting gentlemen are waiting there for you, each with the different interpretation of God but still with the same concept that I'm trying to explain to you right here. Good night.
