>>10724145>More often than not the incorrect outcome is 'chosen' by your inanimate god.That is why any "intelligence" system must first learn what is "correct" and "incorrect". Right now it is done through a variety of methodologies. BUT after what is "correct" and "incorrect" is established, and sufficiently big data was given to that system it DOESN'T make "incorrect" choices.
>Just because you are so damn predictable and lack the ability of original thought dosnt make me that way bud.This not an argument.
Name any action that cannot be represented in a form of an algorithm.
>Keep worshiping your toaster and see where it gets you.Roko's basilik is watching you.
