>>19408613>I see a lot of nervousness about the topic (understandable), however there are a few things that dont add up>1) if they wanted to cull people they could have "simply" poisoned the waterEverything is done in incremental stages that are resilient to failure. They do not consider "simple" ideas. They consider outlandish ideas that no one has defenses for because no one ever thought of them. These plans are resilient to failure because they are set in place with momentum before anyone can do anything about it. For instance, the shots probably have an intergenerational sterilization component where if all the other parts fail, people become sterile after skipping a generation and then it is far too late. It is baked into the genetics of the species.
>2)teraherts frequencies means that the antenna would have to be at very close range and with zero impediments (even clothes might interfere, and for sure the good old tinfoil hat)They are using alien tech. Don't assume that it's even a tech that we have words for when it comes to explaining how the graphene works. There could be another form of radiation we don't understand or consider to be fictional, like non hertizian waves. It is a poor perspective to think that what we are told in school is the completeness of all possible science. we are kept in the dark because we are marked for death by them. Earth is a farm that they want to harvest.
>3)the optogenetics needs actual light to be shined to the cell. not really doable unless you perforate the skull>4)the idea of "shedding" is at least strange, and for sure wouldnt work with an antenna>5)transistors operate on the nanometer scale, but the structure needs some support. It would have an hard time living in a wet system like human bloodWhatever they publish in papers such as picrel is just soft disclosure on tech they've had for a long time.
>Feel free to point out any flaws 