>>17608092>How the fuck are you going to look at a 110 foot wide image on your phone lol?Gee, if only someone had invented scrollbars on computer windows.
>Just watch the movie, faggot. I've seen the movie, it looks fake as fuck. Just like that frame you posted. Fake as all fuck. You realize this of course which is why you're flailing your arms trying to defend it.
Something I just now thought about looking at those two together... Kubrick tinted that scene to be very blue because we tend to remember night scenes as cool or blue (more blue than they actually appear to our eyes even). So his audience would expect a cool, blue color temp because it's "space" and it's "dark" and it's "spooky." The Apollo photograph color temp is warm by comparison, like it was shot at high noon on Earth. Why? Because it's fucking real and a photograph in full sunlight on the moon is going to have a similar color temp to one in full, clear sky sunlight on Earth.
>Besides the Apollo footage was low rez black and white, OK liar
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums 