>>11324415>There is no giant pool of simps throwing money at every woman out thereYou're out of touch with reality. This has nothing to do with being rich or if there are hordes of simps out there, it has more to do with economies of scale. Nothing more, nothing less. Say a woman has an OnlyFans account with 1000 subscribers. Say the minimum amount to get pictures is $10 a month.
$10 x 1000 = $10,000 a month.
$10,000 x 12 = $120,000 a year
And that's just assuming they only have 1000 subscribers and bottom of the barrel prices. Which brings me up to my next point
Simping wasn't this rampant before the advent of this social disease called loneliness and social media. Yes, there were simps but not on a grand scale like this. I remember a time before smartphones and before Facebook/Messenger that I actually had to do any actual effort to get women's attention and up my game. Now, I just use Messenger and Facebook to message women or Tinder to get my dick wet. This is a social disease brought about by the internet. It's a recent phenomenon due in part of a shift brought about by new technology. This has nothing to do with wealth at all when all facets of society is affected by this.
